To triage or not to triage? The history and evidence for this model of care in psychiatry

  • Pinto da Costa M
  • Salimkumar D
  • Chivers J
1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Triage wards were introduced as a new model of psychiatric in-patient care in 2004. However, there is limited evidence comparing them with the traditional in-patient models of care. This article reviews the history of triage wards, their principles, the evidence for this model (e.g. length of in-patient stay, readmission rates, staff and patient satisfaction) and the development of assessment wards based on the triage model of care. The evidence shows that the triage model has higher rates of rapid discharge, with a greater proportion of ‘acute care’ performed in the community with the support of home treatment teams. This leads to lower bed occupancy in the triage wards without increased rates of readmission or a worse patient experience of in-patient care. However, overall staff experience was better in the traditional model, given that staff satisfaction rates were lower on locality wards in settings with triage systems in place. Future research should explore the potential impact on home treatment teams, and the rates of serious incidents due to the high number of acutely unwell patients on triage wards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinto da Costa, M., Salimkumar, D., & Chivers, J. G. (2022). To triage or not to triage? The history and evidence for this model of care in psychiatry. BJPsych Advances, 28(4), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2021.72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free