Endoscopic Preoperative Assessment, Classification of Stenosis, Decision-Making

28Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pediatric Laryngo-Tracheal Stenosis (LTS) comprises different conditions that require precise preoperative assessment and classification. According to the guidelines, the optimal diagnostic work-up of LTS patients relies both on a comprehensive anamnesis and on endoscopic and radiological assessments. All the causes of LTS result in an impairment in airflow, mucociliary clearance, phonation, and sometimes in swallowing disorders. The main goals of treatment are to maintain an adequate respiratory space and restore the Upper Aero-Digestive Tract (UADT) physiology. The first step when dealing with LTS patients is to properly assess their medical history. The main causes of pediatric LTS can be divided into two groups, i.e., congenital and acquired. The most common causes of congenital LTS are: laryngomalacia (60%), vocal fold paralysis (15–20%), subglottic stenosis (SGS) (10–15%), laryngeal webs and atresia (5%), subglottic hemangioma (1.5–3%), and others. On the other hand, 90% of acquired pediatric LTS cases are subsequent to post-intubation injuries. Other less frequent causes are: iatrogenic complications from endoscopic laryngeal interventions, benign tumors, caustic or thermal injuries, external blunt force injury or trauma, chronic inflammatory disorders, or idiopathic causes. Diagnostic work-up consists in a step-by-step investigation: awake and asleep transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TNFL), direct laryngoscopy with 0° and angled telescopes to investigate the type of stenosis (arytenoid mobility, craniocaudal extension, involved anatomical sites, and active or mature scar tissue), and broncho-esophagoscopy to rule out associated mediastinal malformations. To date there are several available classifications for each of the involved sites: Cohen's classification for anterior glottic stenosis, Bogdasarian's for posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) and Myer-Cotton's for subglottic stenosis, even though others are used in daily practice (Lano-Netterville, FLECS, etc.). The European Laryngological Society recently proposed a new classification which is applicable in all LTS cases. In this chapter we deal with preoperative assessment and staging, reviewing the most relevant classifications applicable in patients affected by LTS, conditio sine qua non in order to tailor the best treatment modality to each subject. We'll also detail the comprehensive radiological, endoscopic and functional assessment for the correct use of each staging classification.

References Powered by Scopus

Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes

769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laryngomalacia and its treatment

248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Posterior glottic stenosis: management and outcomes

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of Complications in (Crico-) Tracheal Resection Anastomosis in Adults: A Multicenter Study

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional outcomes after transoral CO<inf>2</inf> laser treatment for posterior glottic stenosis: a bicentric case series

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Filauro, M., Mazzola, F., Missale, F., Canevari, F. R., & Peretti, G. (2020, January 8). Endoscopic Preoperative Assessment, Classification of Stenosis, Decision-Making. Frontiers in Pediatrics. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00532

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

73%

Researcher 7

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 53

91%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

5%

Social Sciences 1

2%

Engineering 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 31

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0