Recent work on narrative-based arguments has insisted on the importance, for assessment, of construing a theory of story “credibility” or “believability”. The main tenet of most approaches is the idea that a credible story should resemble “reality”. However, “narrative realism” is a rather problematic concept. The paper proposes a more nuanced, multi-dimensional and explicitly meta-argumentative approach to the assessment of arguments involving narratives that would not prejudge their argumentative form or function.
CITATION STYLE
Olmos, P. (2015). Story Credibility in Narrative Arguments. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 28, pp. 155–167). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_12
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.