Early determination of the reproductive number for vector-borne diseases: The case of dengue in Brazil

107Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a new method of deriving the reproductive number for vector-borne diseases from the early epidemic curves for vector-borne diseases with incubations in the vectors and in the hosts. Method: We applied the model to several dengue epidemics in different climatic regions of Brazil: Brasilia, Belém, Fortaleza, Boa Vista. Results: The new method leads to higher estimates of the reproductive number than previous models. Conclusion: At present, Aedes aegypti densities, the meeting of more compatible strains of viruses and mosquitoes, may lead to re-emergence of urban yellow fever epidemics. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome

1139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dengue: An update

984Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Different epidemic curves for severe acute respiratory syndrome reveal similar impacts of control measures

866Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dengue virus-mosquito interactions

327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of the reproduction number of dengue fever from spatial epidemic data

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Favier, C., Degallier, N., Rosa-Freitas, M. G., Boulanger, J. P., Costa Lima, J. R., Luitgards-Moura, J. F., … Tsouris, P. (2006). Early determination of the reproductive number for vector-borne diseases: The case of dengue in Brazil. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 11(3), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01560.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 67

49%

Researcher 48

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 19

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 28

25%

Mathematics 23

21%

Environmental Science 17

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free