Case Study: Does training of private networks of Family Planning clinicians in urban Pakistan affect service utilization?

15Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. To determine whether training of providers participating in franchise clinic networks is associated with increased Family Planning service use among low-income urban families in Pakistan. Methods. The study uses 2001 survey data consisting of interviews with 1113 clinical and non-clinical providers working in public and private hospitals/clinics. Data analysis excludes non-clinical providers reducing sample size to 822. Variables for the analysis are divided into client volume, and training in family planning. Regression models are used to compute the association between training and service use in franchise versus private non-franchise clinics. Results. In franchise clinic networks, staff are 6.5 times more likely to receive family planning training (P = 0.00) relative to private non-franchises. Service use was significantly associated with training (P = 0.00), franchise affiliation (P = 0.01), providers' years of family planning experience (P = 0.02) and the number of trained staff working at government owned clinics (P = 0.00). In this setting, nurses are significantly less likely to receive training compared to doctors (P = 0.00). Conclusions. These findings suggest that franchises recruit and train various cadres of health workers and training maybe associated with increased service use through improvement in quality of services. © 2010 Qureshi; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qureshi, A. M. (2010). Case Study: Does training of private networks of Family Planning clinicians in urban Pakistan affect service utilization? BMC International Health and Human Rights, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-10-26

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

65%

Researcher 6

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

45%

Social Sciences 10

32%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

16%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free