The combined impact of adherence to five lifestyle factors on all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality: A prospective cohort study among Danish men and women

81Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Individual lifestyle factors have been associated with lifestyle diseases and premature mortality by an accumulating body of evidence. The impact of a combination of lifestyle factors on mortality has been investigated in several studies, but few have applied a simple index taking national guidelines into account. The objective of the present prospective cohort study was to investigate the combined impact of adherence to five lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, waist circumference and diet) on all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality based on international and national health recommendations. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI. During a median follow-up of 14 years, 3941 men and 2827 women died. Among men, adherence to one additional health recommendation was associated with an adjusted HR of 0·73 (95% CI 0·71, 0·75) for all-cause mortality, 0·74 (95% CI 0·71, 0·78) for cancer mortality and 0·70 (95% CI 0·65, 0·75) for cardiovascular mortality. Among women, the corresponding HR was 0·72 (95% CI 0·70, 0·75) for all-cause mortality, 0·76 (95% CI 0·73, 0·80) for cancer mortality and 0·63 (95% CI 0·57, 0·70) for cardiovascular mortality. In the present study, adherence to merely one additional health recommendation had a protective effect on mortality risk, indicating a huge potential in enhancing healthy lifestyle behaviours of the population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petersen, K. E. N., Johnsen, N. F., Olsen, A., Albieri, V., Olsen, L. K. H., Dragsted, L. O., … Egeberg, R. (2015). The combined impact of adherence to five lifestyle factors on all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality: A prospective cohort study among Danish men and women. British Journal of Nutrition, 113(5), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515000070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free