The Association of Teamlets and Teams with Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Primary care “teamlets” in which a staff member and physician consistently work together might provide a simple, cost-effective way to improve care, with or without insertion within a team. Objective: To determine the prevalence and performance of teamlets and teams. Design: Cross-sectional observational study linking survey responses to Medicare claims. Participants: Six hundred eighty-eight general internists and family physicians. Interventions: Based on survey responses, physicians were assigned to one of four teamlet/team categories (e.g., teamlet/no team) and, in secondary analyses, to one of eight teamlet/team categories that classified teamlets into high, medium, and low collaboration as perceived by the physician (e.g., teamlet perceived-high collaboration/no team). Main Measures: Descriptive: percentage of physicians in teamlet/team categories. Outcome measures: physician burnout; ambulatory care sensitive emergency department and hospital admissions; Medicare spending. Key Results: 77.4% of physicians practiced in teamlets; 36.7% in teams. Of the four categories, 49.1% practiced in the teamlet/no team category; 28.3% in the teamlet/team category; 8.4% in no teamlet/team; 14.1% in no teamlet/no team. 15.7%, 47.4%, and 14.4% of physicians practiced in perceived high-, medium-, and low-collaboration teamlets. Physicians who practiced neither in a teamlet nor in a team had significantly lower rates of burnout compared to the three teamlet/team categories. There were no consistent, significant differences in outcomes or Medicare spending by teamlet/team or teamlet perceived-collaboration/team categories compared to no teamlet/no team, for Medicare beneficiaries in general or for dual-eligible beneficiaries. Conclusions: Most general internists and family physicians practice in teamlets, and some practice in teams, but neither practicing in a teamlet, in a team, or in the two together was associated with lower physician burnout, better outcomes for patients, or lower Medicare spending. Further study is indicated to investigate whether certain types of teamlet, teams, or teamlets within teams can achieve higher performance.

References Powered by Scopus

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

21072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Super learner

1410Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models

1285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-Performing Teamlets in Primary Care: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of Burnout With Primary Care Clinician Perception of Team-Based Scheduling Support

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning the Language of Medical Interpreters

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casalino, L. P., Jung, H. Y., Bodenheimer, T., Diaz, I., Chen, M. A., Willard-Grace, R., … Unruh, M. A. (2023). The Association of Teamlets and Teams with Physician Burnout and Patient Outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 38(6), 1384–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07894-7

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0