Production and energy-use efficiency of greater yam (Dioscorea alata)-based intercropping system as influenced by intercrops and planting patterns

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Bhubaneshwar during 2001-02 and 2002-03 on acid laterite soils under rainfed conditions, to assess the production and energy-use efficiency of various greater yam (Dioscorea alata) based intercropping systems. Greater yam was planted at normal (90 × 90 cm), paired (60/120 × 90 cm) and skipped rows (90/180 × 90 cm) with 1,2 and 3 rows of maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] respectively as intercrop. Sole greater yam was planted as control. The maximum tuber-equivalent yield (18.7 t/ha), land-equivalent ratio (1.37) and production efficiency (89.2 kg/ha/day) were obtained with maize as an intercrop in greater yam (normal planting), followed by greater yam (paired row planting). Pigeonpea and sorghum were the next best intercrops in the order. Similarly, intercropping with normal row and paired row planting irrespective of intercrops produced higher output energy (84.25-100.70 × 103 MJ/ha). Skipped row planting, due to lower greater yam tuber yield, recorded lower tuber-equivalent yield, land-equivalent ratio, production efficiency and energy output than sole greater yam cropping. However, energy output: input ratio and energy-use efficiency of greater yam + pigeonpea in skipped row planting was highest due to its lowest seed as well as manures and fertilizers energy inputs. Greater yam + maize (normal row planting) intercropping system was the next best in energy output: input ratio due to higher energy from the yields. Thus, maize was the best intercrop (1 row) with greater yam planted at normal rows (90 cm × 90 cm).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nedunchezhiyan, M. (2007). Production and energy-use efficiency of greater yam (Dioscorea alata)-based intercropping system as influenced by intercrops and planting patterns. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52(3), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i3.4927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free