Using Hierarchical Bayesian Multispecies Mixture Models to Estimate Tandem Hoop-net-Based Habitat Associations and Detection Probabilities of Fishes in Reservoirs

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstract: Species distribution models are useful tools to evaluate habitat relationships of fishes. We used hierarchical Bayesian multispecies mixture models to evaluate the relationships of both detection and abundance with habitat of reservoir fishes caught using tandem hoop nets. A total of 7,212 fish from 12 species were captured, and the majority of the catch was composed of Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus (46%), Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus (25%), and White Crappie Pomoxis annularis (14%). Detection estimates ranged from 8% to 69%, and modeling results suggested that fishes were primarily influenced by reservoir size and context, water clarity and temperature, and land-use types. Species were differentially abundant within and among habitat types, and some fishes were found to be more abundant in turbid, less impacted (e.g., by urbanization and agriculture) reservoirs with longer shoreline lengths; whereas, other species were found more often in clear, nutrient-rich impoundments that had generally shorter shoreline length and were surrounded by a higher percentage of agricultural land. Our results demonstrated that habitat and reservoir characteristics may differentially benefit species and assemblage structure. This study provides a useful framework for evaluating capture efficiency for not only hoop nets but other gear types used to sample fishes in reservoirs. Received October 14, 2014; accepted December 23, 2015 Published online April 11, 2016

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewart, D. R., & Long, J. M. (2016). Using Hierarchical Bayesian Multispecies Mixture Models to Estimate Tandem Hoop-net-Based Habitat Associations and Detection Probabilities of Fishes in Reservoirs. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 145(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2016.1143395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free