Treat-and-extend versus every-other-month regimens with aflibercept in age-related macular degeneration

40Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the 1-year outcomes of treat-and-extend (TAE) and every-other-month (2M) regimens with intravitreal aflibercept in Japanese wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes in which the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was maintained at week 52 [with a loss of <0.3 logarithm of minimum angular of resolution (logMAR) units]. The secondary outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in the central retinal thickness (CRT) and the number of injections. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled. The mean changes in the BCVA from baseline in the TAE and 2M were −0.32 ± 0.27 and −0.26 ± 0.30 logMAR units (p = 0.46). The TAE group was noninferior to the 2M group in BCVA maintenance. The mean CRT changes from baseline in the TAE and 2M were −161 ± 133 and −157 ± 90 μm (p = 0.73). The mean number of injections in the TAE and 2M were 7.5 ± 1.2 (range, 7–12) and 8.0 ± 0.0 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with aflibercept improved the BCVA and CRT to the same extent as 2M regimen, with a reduced number of injections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haga, A., Kawaji, T., Ideta, R., Inomata, Y., & Tanihara, H. (2018). Treat-and-extend versus every-other-month regimens with aflibercept in age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica, 96(3), e393–e398. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13607

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free