Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD. Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: (Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland). Results: Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria. Conclusions: While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nøland, S. T., Magnø, M. S., Utheim, T. P., & Chen, X. (2024). Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review. Current Eye Research. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2023.2301325

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free