Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery—Results from a postmarketing study

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is followed by reoperations in approximately 25%. Reoperations lead to an increased risk of infection and wound healing problems as well as a worse cosmetic outcome. Several technical approaches for an intraoperative margin assessment to decrease the reoperation rate are under evaluation, some of them are still experimental. Methods: A prospective single-arm post-marketing study with 60 patients undergoing BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer was conducted. The specimen was intraoperatively examined by the ClearSight™ system, a mobile magnetic resonance imaging system that is based on a diffusion-weighted imaging protocol. However, the results were blinded to the surgeon. Results: The ClearSight™ system was performed for both ductal and lobular breast cancer and DCIS, with a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.96) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.92), with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 80%. Conclusion: Had the ClearSight™ been known to the surgeon intraoperatively, the reoperation rate would have been reduced by 83% for invasive carcinoma, from 10% to 2%, and 50% for DCIS, from 30% to 15% reoperations. A trial designed to examine the impact on reoperation rates is currently ongoing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thill, M., Szwarcfiter, I., Kelling, K., van Haasteren, V., Kolka, E., Noelke, J., … Allweis, T. (2022). Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSightTM system in breast-conserving surgery—Results from a postmarketing study. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 125(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free