A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Citation distributions are so skewed that using the mean or any other central tendency measure is ill-advised. Unlike G. Prathap's scalar measures (Energy, Exergy, and Entropy or EEE), the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) is based on non-parametric statistics using the (100) percentiles of the distribution. Observed values can be tested against expected ones; impact can be qualified at the article level and then aggregated. © 2011 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (2012, February). A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0502-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free