Cancer screening and follow-up in general practice: A French nationwide cross-sectional study

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The overall activity of general practitioners (GPs) related to cancer screening and follow-up is poorly documented. Objectives: To describe cancer screening and follow-up activities carried out in general practice and analyse them according to the socio-economic characteristics of patients. Methods: We used data from a French nationwide, multicentre, cross-sectional study that described the distribution of health problems managed in general practice and the associated processes of care. Analyses were adjusted on age and gender when appropriate, using a multivariate, hierarchical, linear mixed-effects model. Results: Among 20,613 consultations recorded, 580 involved cancer screening (2.8%) and 475 cancer follow-ups (2.3%). The most frequent cancer screening procedures concerned colorectal cancer (38.6% of screening procedures), breast cancer (32.6%), cervical cancer (17.0%), and prostate cancer (9.3%). In consultations with female patients, the most frequent types of cancer followed up were breast (44.9%) and colorectal cancer (10.5%), and with male patients, the most frequent were prostate (37.3%) and skin cancer (10.3%). After adjustment on age and gender, consultations with cancer follow-up included a mean 1.9 health problems managed in addition to cancer. Consultations with cancer screening or follow-up issue less often involved a patient on low income than other consultations (2.4% vs. 4.2%, and 1.1% vs. 4.2%, respectively). Conclusion: Around 5% of French general practice consultations include cancer screening or follow-up. Socio-economical inequalities demand further research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lamort-Bouché, M., Chardon, M., Kellou, N., Ray-Coquard, I., Colin, C., & Letrilliart, L. (2020). Cancer screening and follow-up in general practice: A French nationwide cross-sectional study. European Journal of General Practice, 26(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2020.1784875

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free