The Use of Videos to Develop and Evaluate Mathematical Skills

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents how to develop and evaluate mathematical skills using videos. A methodology is used to develop mathematical skills in engineering students, which includes the use of 3d tools and videos. We present a scale to measure eight mathematical skills: argumentation, communication, modeling, problem solving, representation, mathematical language and use of technological tools. This scale is used to evaluate videos as pre-test and post-test. Alternatively, a final test is applied that measures the level of development of mathematical skills. It is found that the average relative gain in the development of mathematical skills is 33.7%. It is also found that there is a statistically significant relationship between the learning gain measured with the videos and the final test of the students.

References Powered by Scopus

Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses

3661Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Using Videos as a Pre-class Learning Experience in the Flipped Classroom

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing spatial mathematical skills through 3D tools: augmented reality, virtual environments and 3D printing

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Facilitating Mathematical Competencies Development for Undergraduate Students During the Pandemic Through ad-hoc Technological Learning Environments

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herrera, L. M. M. (2020). The Use of Videos to Develop and Evaluate Mathematical Skills. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 10–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392305.3396900

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

36%

Computer Science 3

27%

Mathematics 2

18%

Engineering 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free