Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between USG and MRCP in biliary and pancreatic pathology

3Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective:- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy between USG & MRCP in the patients suspected of biliary and pancreatic pathology. Material & methods: Fifty patients attending the hospital of all age groups and both sexes, suspected of biliary and pancreatic pathology, were examined first by USG and followed by MRCP, and findings were correlated with ERCP and biopsy report. Results:- Out of 50 patients 38 patients had biliary pathology and 12 patients had pancreatic pathology. Out of this, MRCP was 98 % accurate in diagnosis when results were compared in all cases. USG didn't help in case of CBD stricture, in evaluating Pancreatic duct into Chronic pancreatitis and in lower end of CBD pathology. Conclusion:- USG is the cheap and easily available modality so, it is the primary investigative modality for suspected patients of biliary and pancreatic pathology, but MRCP has high diagnostic value.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhatt, C., Shah, P. S., Prajapati, H. J., & Modi, J. (2005). Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between USG and MRCP in biliary and pancreatic pathology. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 15(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.28796

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free