Some reflections on the renewal-theory paradox in queueing theory

9Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The classical renewal-theory (waiting time, or inspection) paradox states that the length of the renewal interval that covers a randomly-selected time epoch tends to be longer than an ordinary renewal interval. This paradox manifests itself in numerous interesting ways in queueing theory, a prime example being the celebrated Pollaczek-Khintchine formula for the mean waiting time in the M/G/1 queue. In this expository paper, we give intuitive arguments that "explain" why the renewal-theory paradox is ubiquitous in queueing theory, and why it sometimes produces anomalous results. In particular, we use these intuitive arguments to explain decomposition in vacation models, and to derive formulas that describe some recently-discovered counterintuitive results for polling models, such as the reduction of waiting times as a consequence of forcing the server to set up even when no work is waiting. ©1998 by North Atlantic Science Publishing Company.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooper, R. B., Niu, S. C., & Srinivasan, M. M. (1998). Some reflections on the renewal-theory paradox in queueing theory. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Stochastic Analysis, 11(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1155/S104895339800029X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free