Ceftriaxone for alexander’s disease: A four-year follow-up

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2010, we reported the successful clinical outcome related to a 20-month course of intravenous, cyclical ceftriaxone, in a patient with adult-onset Alexander’s disease. We now provide evidence that the progression of the patient’s signs/symptoms was halted and reversed with a 4-year-long extension of the trial. The patient’s clinical signs/symptoms were evaluated before the start and every 6 months for 6 years. For the early 2 years, without therapy, and for the following 4 years, after intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g daily, for 3 weeks monthly during the initial 4 months, then for 15 days monthly. Gait ataxia and dysarthria were assessed clinically on a 0 to 4 scale. Palatal myoclonus and nystagmus/oscillopsia were monitored by videotape and a self-evaluation scale. The degree of disability, measured by a modified Rankin scale, and the brain MRI were periodically evaluated. Before ceftriaxone therapy, in a 2-year period, gait ataxia and dysarthria worsened from mild to marked, palatal myoclonus spread from the soft palate to lower facial muscles, and the patient complained of oscillopsia. After 4 years of ceftriaxone therapy, gait ataxia and dysarthria improved, from marked to mild at clinical rating scales. The palatal myoclonus was undetectable; the patient did not complained of oscillopsia and declared a progressively better quality of life. Ceftriaxone was safe. This case report provides Class IV evidence that intravenous cycles of ceftriaxone may halt and/or reverse the progression of neurodegeneration in patients with adult-onset Alexander’s disease and may significantly improve their quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sechi, G. P., Ceccherini, I., Bachetti, T., Deiana, G. A., Sechi, E., & Balbi, P. (2013). Ceftriaxone for alexander’s disease: A four-year follow-up. In JIMD Reports (Vol. 9, pp. 67–71). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/8904_2012_180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free