Dissecting the roles of supervised and unsupervised learning in perceptual discrimination judgments

11Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our ability to compare sensory stimuli is a fundamental cognitive function, which is known to be affected by two biases: choice bias, which reflects a preference for a given response, and contraction bias, which reflects a tendency to perceive stimuli as similar to previous ones. To test whether both reflect supervised processes, we designed feedback protocols aimed to modify them and tested them in human participants. Choice bias was readily modifiable. However, contraction bias was not. To compare these results to those predicted from an optimal supervised process, we studied a noise-matched optimal linear discriminator (Perceptron). In this model, both biases were substantially modified, indicating that the "resilience"of contraction bias to feedback does not maximize performance. These results suggest that perceptual discrimination is a hierarchical, two-stage process. In the first, stimulus statistics are learned and integrated with representations in an unsupervised process that is impenetrable to external feedback. In the second, a binary judgment, learned in a supervised way, is applied to the combined percept.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loewenstein, Y., Raviv, O., & Ahissar, M. (2021). Dissecting the roles of supervised and unsupervised learning in perceptual discrimination judgments. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(4), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0757-20.2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free