Selection of ontologies for the Semantic Web

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The development of the Semantic Web has encouraged the creation of ontologies in a great variety of domains. Web users currently looking for ontologies in order to incorporate them into their systems, just use their experience and intuition. This makes it difficult for them to justify their choices. Mainly, this is due to the lack of methods that help the user to measure that the most appropriate ontologies for the new system are. To solve this deficiency, this work proposes a method which allows the users to measure the suitability of the existent ontologies, regarding the requirements of their systems. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.

References Powered by Scopus

The semantic web

10603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures

7518Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A roadmap to ontology specification languages

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A survey of ontology learning techniques and applications

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ontology population and enrichment: State of the art

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gold standard evaluation of ontology learning methods through ontology transformation and alignment

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lozano-Tello, A., Gómez-Pérez, A., & Sosa, E. (2003). Selection of ontologies for the Semantic Web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2722, 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45068-8_77

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘19‘22‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

82%

Arts and Humanities 2

12%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0