Is working memory training effective? A study in a school setting

50Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We tested the effectiveness of an intensive, on average 17-session, adaptive and computerized working-memory training program for improving performance on untrained, paper and pencil working memory tasks, standardized school achievement tasks, and teacher ratings of classroom behavior. Third-grade children received either a computerized working memory training for about 30 minutes per session (n = 156) or participated in regular classroom activities (n = 126). Results indicated strong gains in the training task. Further, pretest and posttest transfer measures of working memory and school achievement, as well as teacher ratings, showed substantial correlations with training task performance, suggesting that the training task captured abilities that were relevant for the transfer tasks. However, effect sizes of training-specific transfer gains were very small and not consistent across tasks. These results raise questions about the benefits of intensive working-memory training programs within a regular school context. © 2014 Rode et al.

References Powered by Scopus

Working memory

8899Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

6535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Working memory capacity as executive attention

1866Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer”: Evidence From a Meta-Analytic Review

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increased Screen Time: Implications for Early Childhood Development and Behavior

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Working memory training in typically developing children: A meta-analysis of the available evidence

171Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rode, C., Robson, R., Purviance, A., Geary, D. C., & Mayr, U. (2014). Is working memory training effective? A study in a school setting. PLoS ONE, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104796

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 86

70%

Researcher 18

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 80

65%

Social Sciences 23

19%

Neuroscience 14

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free