Crowding and attention in a framework of neural network model

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, I present a framework that would accommodate the classic ideas of visual information processing together with more recent computational approaches. I used the current knowledge about visual crowding, capacity limitations, attention, and saliency to place these phenomena within a standard neural network model. I suggest some revisions to traditional mechanisms of attention and feature integration that are required to fit better into this framework. The results allow us to explain some apparent theoretical controversies in vision research, suggesting a rationale for the limited spatial extent of crowding, a role of saliency in crowding experiments, and several amendments to the feature integration theory. The scheme can be elaborated or modified by future research.

References Powered by Scopus

A feature-integration theory of attention

9477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position

3906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention

2549Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Unlocking crowding by ensemble statistics

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the relation between crowding and ensemble perception: Examining the role of attention

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Põder, E. (2020). Crowding and attention in a framework of neural network model. Journal of Vision, 20(13), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/JOV.20.13.19

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 2

40%

Decision Sciences 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free