William james’s argument for a finite theism

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As part of his general polemic against monism and idealism, William James advocated a God, or a multitude of gods, as both limited in influence and set off against other forces in the cosmos. It was by championing a deity amenable to a pluralistic and open-ended universe that James sought not only to promote the morally vigorous life, but to do justice to the full texture of human experience. What follows is an exploration and critical analysis of James’s finite theism. After briefly tracing the development of James’s concept of deity throughout his philosophical writings, I concentrate upon, and assess, the complex argument offered in A Pluralistic Universe. Along the way, the relevance of Henry James Sr., Richard Gale, and Alfred North Whitehead is brought into the discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weidenbaum, J. (2013). William james’s argument for a finite theism. In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities (pp. 323–331). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free