Standard versus specific therapy for chronic osteomyelitis treatment

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

58 patients with chronic osteomyelitis were treated either with a standard therapy or with a specific targeted therapy based on the antibiogram assay. Standard therapy was performed by a 15-day course of a parenteral cephalosporin (usually ceftriaxone) in combination with an aminoglycoside (e.g. netilmicin), followed by oral therapy with a fluoroquinolone (generally ciprofloxacin) for 1 to 3 months; specific therapy largely varied depending on the antibiogram response. The results indicated that no significant differences were found between the patients who received standard therapy (95.5 % cured) and those who received a specific therapy (93.5 % cured), after a one year follow-up. It can be concluded that a short-term combined parenteral-oral standard therapy, indicated in all those cases where antibiotic therapy must be started before obtaining the laboratory response, or when a clear and definite identification of the microorganisms involved in the infection is not possible, can be as efficient as an antibiogram-guided therapy in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. © 2007 Science Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingianni, A., Lampis, G., Laconi, S., Cariello, D., & Pompei, R. (2007). Standard versus specific therapy for chronic osteomyelitis treatment. American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 3(3), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2007.128.133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free