Ontological view-driven semantic integration in collaborative networks

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In collaborative enterprise networks, semantic heterogeneity is an important factor that hinders collaboration of various information systems. Ontology-driven semantic integration is an important category of solutions for the semantic integration problem. However, in many domains, there are no explicit and formal ontologies available. This paper proposes to adopt ontological views to address such challenges. It investigates the theoretical foundation of ontologies and ontological views. It presents a framework as a solution, based on the theoretical foundation, including the architecture of a semantic integration enabled environment, the modeling and representation of ontological views, and the semantic equivalence relationship discovered from the ontological views. © 2009 IFIP.

References Powered by Scopus

Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing

4608Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching

2564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches

813Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Semantic information and knowledge integration through argumentative reasoning to support intelligent decision making

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discovery of potential collaboration networks from open knowledge sources

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Agent oriented media recommender system utilizing Smart multimedia

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xue, Y., Ghenniwa, H. H., & Shen, W. (2009). Ontological view-driven semantic integration in collaborative networks. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 307, pp. 311–318). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04568-4_33

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Researcher 2

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 6

55%

Engineering 3

27%

Social Sciences 1

9%

Chemistry 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free