Comparative diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer recurrence

26Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the last decades, in addition to conventional imaging techniques and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) has been shown to be relevant in the detection and management of breast cancer recurrence in doubtful cases in selected groups of patients. While there are no conclusive data indicating that imaging tests, including FDG PET/CT, produce a survival benefit in asymptomatic patients, FDG PET/CT can be useful for identifying the site of relapse when traditional imaging methods are equivocal or conflicting and for identifying or confirming isolated loco-regional relapse or isolated metastatic lesions. The present narrative review deals with the potential role of FDG PET in these clinical settings by comparing its accuracy and impact with conventional imaging modalities such as CT, ultrasound, bone scan, 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT (18F-NaF PET/CT) as well as MRI. Patient-focused perspectives in terms of patients’ satisfaction and acceptability are also discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piva, R., Ticconi, F., Ceriani, V., Scalorbi, F., Fiz, F., Capitanio, S., … Morbelli, S. (2017, July 4). Comparative diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S111098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free