Increased incidence of serious late adverse events with drug-eluting stents when compared with coronary artery bypass surgery: A cause of concern

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in pre-drug-eluting stents (DESs) era, randomized trials and meta-analysis showed that the extension of coronary artery disease was not associated with a better survival with CABG, and only diabetic patients had an inferior survival with PCI. After the introduction of DES, we would expect a substantial improvement in PCI results compared with CABG, narrowing the gap between both revascularization strategies, However, on the contrary, most randomized studies between DES and CABG showed that rate of recurrences remained and there is an unexpected increased of late serious adverse events including spontaneous myocardial infarction and death. In this review, we try to described each of these problems and find out explanations for these new findings searching for potential solutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mieres, J., Rodríguez, A. E., Fernández-Pereira, C., & Ascarrunz-Cattoretti, D. (2020, November 1). Increased incidence of serious late adverse events with drug-eluting stents when compared with coronary artery bypass surgery: A cause of concern. Future Cardiology. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2020-0033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free