Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation in the Definitive Management of Node-Positive Cervical Cancer

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the safety and outcomes of elective para-aortic (PA) nodal irradiation utilizing modern treatment techniques for patients with node positive cervical cancer. Methods: Patients with pelvic lymph node positive cervical cancer who received radiation were included. All patients received radiation therapy (RT) to either a traditional pelvic field or an extended field to electively cover the PA nodes. Factors associated with survival were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model, and toxicities between groups were compared with a chi-square test. Results: 96 patients were identified with a mean follow up of 40 months. The incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 31% in the elective PA nodal RT group and 15% in the pelvic field group (Chi-square p = 0.067. There was no significant difference in rates of grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities between the two groups (p>0.05). The KM estimated 5-year OS was not statistically different for those receiving elective PA nodal irradiation compared to a pelvic only field, 54% vs. 73% respectively (log-rank p = 0.11). Conclusions: Elective PA nodal RT can safely be delivered utilizing modern planning techniques without a significant increase in severe (grade ≥ 3) acute or late toxicities, at the cost of a possible small increase in non-severe (grade 2) acute toxicities. In this series there was no survival benefit observed with the receipt of elective PA nodal RT, however, this benefit may have been obscured by the higher risk features of this population. While prospective randomized trials utilizing a risk adapted approach to elective PA nodal coverage are the only way to fully evaluate the benefit of elective PA nodal coverage, these trials are unlikely to be performed and instead we must rely on interpretation of results of risk adapted approaches like those used in ongoing clinical trials and retrospective data.

References Powered by Scopus

Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

2378Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer

2047Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix

2019Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Dose Escalation in Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: 5-Year Experience in a Single Institution

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of para-aortic lymph node irradiation on disease-free survival in patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanders, J. C., Muller, D. A., Dutta, S. W., Corriher, T. J., Ring, K. L., Showalter, T. N., & Romano, K. D. (2021). Para-Aortic Nodal Radiation in the Definitive Management of Node-Positive Cervical Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.664714

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

75%

Design 1

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 57

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free