Are timed automata updatable?

37Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In classical timed automata, as defined by ALUR and DILL [AD90, AD94] and since widely studied, the only operation allowed to modify the clocks is the reset operation. For instance, a clock can neither be set to a non-null constant value, nor be set to the value of another clock nor, in a non-deterministic way, to some value lower or higher than a given constant. In this paper we study in details such updates. We characterize in a thin way the frontier between decidability and undecidability. Our main contributions are the following: - We exhibit many classes of updates for which emptiness is undecidable. These classes depend on the clock constraints that are used - diagonal-free or not - whereas it is well known that these two kinds of constraints are equivalent for classical timed automata. - We propose a generalization of the region automaton proposed by ALUR and DILL, allowing to handle larger classes of updates. The complexity of the decision procedure remains PSPACE-complete. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouyer, P., Dufourd, C., Fleury, E., & Petit, A. (2000). Are timed automata updatable? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 1855, 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/10722167_35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free