What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey

2Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present the results of the NLP Community Metasurvey. Run from May to June 2022, it elicited opinions on controversial issues, including industry influence in the field, concerns about AGI, and ethics. Our results put concrete numbers to several controversies: For example, respondents are split in half on the importance of artificial general intelligence, whether language models understand language, and the necessity of linguistic structure and inductive bias for solving NLP problems. In addition, the survey posed meta-questions, asking respondents to predict the distribution of survey responses. This allows us to uncover false sociological beliefs where the community's predictions don't match reality. Among other results, we find that the community greatly overestimates its own belief in the usefulness of benchmarks and the potential for scaling to solve real-world problems, while underestimating its belief in the importance of linguistic structure, inductive bias, and interdisciplinary science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michael, J., Holtzman, A., Parrish, A., Mueller, A., Wang, A., Chen, A., … Bowman, S. R. (2023). What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 16334–16368). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.903

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free