Specialist nurses’ perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators

26Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Increasing the number of patients participating in research studies is a current priority in the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. The role of specialist nurses in inviting patients to participate is important, yet little is known about their experiences of doing so. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of barriers and facilitators held by specialist nurses with experience of inviting adult NHS patients to a wide variety of research studies. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative descriptive study was conducted between March and July 2015. Participants were 12 specialist nurses representing 7 different clinical specialties and 7 different NHS Trusts. We collected data using individual semi-structured interviews, and analysed transcripts using the Framework method to inductively gain a descriptive overview of barriers and facilitators. Results: Barriers and facilitators were complex and interdependent. Perceptions varied among individuals, however barriers and facilitators centred on five main themes: i) assessing patient suitability, ii) teamwork, iii) valuing research, iv) the invitation process and v) understanding the study. Facilitators to inviting patients to participate in research often stemmed from specialist nurses’ attitudes, skills and experience. Positive research cultures, effective teamwork and strong relationships between research and clinical teams at the local clinical team level were similarly important. Barriers were reported when specialist nurses felt they were providing patients with insufficient information during the invitation process, and when specialist nurses felt they did not understand studies to their satisfaction. Conclusion: Our study offers several new insights regarding the role of specialist nurses in recruiting patients for research. It shows that strong local research culture and teamwork overcome some wider organisational and workload barriers reported in previous studies. In addition, and in contrast to common practice, our findings suggest research teams may benefit from individualising study training and invitation procedures to specialist nurses’ preferences and requirements. Findings provide a basis for reflection on practice for specialist nurses, research teams, policymakers, and all with an interest in increasing patient participation in research.

References Powered by Scopus

Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description?

8509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

2875Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Barriers and facilitators to participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials: A qualitative perspective

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

French, C., & Stavropoulou, C. (2016). Specialist nurses’ perceptions of inviting patients to participate in clinical research studies: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers and facilitators. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0204-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

64%

Researcher 14

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 21

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 12

29%

Social Sciences 6

14%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free