JOB SATISFACTION IN THE ARMED FORCES: DIFFERENCES AMONG RANKS

0Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Human resource management has attracted significant attention among researchers of public management. It is increasingly accepted that committed and satisfied employees are strategic resources in any organization. The idiosyncrasies of the armed forces and the professionalization processes they have undergone necessitate a study of the attitudes of military personnel towards work in the sector. This paper analyses the determinants of job satisfaction in the military. Three factors (“Work itself”, “Economic aspects” and “Personal relationships”) are identified based on data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP). Both the composition and the impact of these factors on job satisfaction vary according to the hierarchical rank of a worker. The findings confirm the importance of differentiated human resources policies that take into account the hierarchical diversity of the military. Our results provide new evidence and valuable practical information for human resource management in the armed forces. We provide policymakers and managers of the military sector with recommendations that allow them to reinforce the ability of the armed forces to attract, retain and motivate talent.

References Powered by Scopus

Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

35930Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment

3444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being

1593Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gargallo-Castel, A. F., & Marzo-Navarro, M. (2024). JOB SATISFACTION IN THE ARMED FORCES: DIFFERENCES AMONG RANKS. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-1/3

Readers over time

‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

67%

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0