Energy Efficiency and Directed Technical Change: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation

12Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I develop a directed technical change model of economic growth and energy efficiency in order to study the impact of climate change mitigation policies on energy use. I show that the standard Cobb–Douglas production function used in the environmental macroeconomics literature overstates the reduction in cumulative energy use that can be achieved with a given path of energy taxes. I also show that, in the model, the government combines energy taxes with research and development (R&D) policy that favors output-increasing technology—rather than energy efficiency technology—to maximize welfare subject to a constraint on cumulative energy use. In addition, I study energy use dynamics following sudden improvements in energy efficiency. Exogenous shocks that increase energy efficiency also decrease the incentive for subsequent energy efficiency R&D and increase long-run energy use relative to a world without the original shock. Subsidies for energy efficiency R&D, however, permanently alter R&D incentives and decrease long-run energy use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, G. (2024). Energy Efficiency and Directed Technical Change: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation. Review of Economic Studies, 91(1), 192–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free