Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence

58Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent research has investigated the process of integrating perceptual evidence toward a decision, converging on a number of sequential sampling choice models, such as variants of race and diffusion models and the non-linear leaky competing accumulator (LCA) model. Here we study extensions of these models to multi-alternative choice, considering how well they can account for data from a psychophysical experiment in which the evidence supporting each of the alternatives changes dynamically during the trial, in a way that creates temporal correlations. We find that participants exhibit a tendency to choose an alternative whose evidence profile is temporally anti-correlated with (or dissimilar from) that of other alternatives. This advantage of the anti-correlated alternative is well accounted for in the LCA, and provides constraints that challenge several other models of multi-alternative choice. © 2011 Tsetsos, Usher and McClelland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsetsos, K., Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2011). Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, (MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free