In this theoretic note, the rationale for the physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function in dynamic PET is investigated, using the Patlak equation as an example. Methods: The Patlak equation conventionally obtained when correcting the 18F-FDG input function and correcting the tissue activity measurement for 18F physical decay can also be derived from a 2-compartment analysis that does not conceptually involve any physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function but accounts only for the physical decay of the trapped tracer. Results: We demonstrate that exactly the same equation can be derived from the 2 conceptual approaches, and hence each approach yields the correct uptake rate of the tracer. Conclusion: No advantage in 18F-FDG dynamic PET can be expected from using the concept of uncorrected data rather than that of decay-corrected data. Nevertheless, conceptually, we show that correcting the 18F-FDG input function for radioactive decay cannot be justified and that this correction is not compatible with the calculation of patient radiation dose. Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Laffon, E., Barret, O., Marthan, R., & Ducassou, D. (2009). Is the physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function in dynamic PET imaging justified? Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 37(2), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.108.060350
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.