Is the physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function in dynamic PET imaging justified?

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this theoretic note, the rationale for the physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function in dynamic PET is investigated, using the Patlak equation as an example. Methods: The Patlak equation conventionally obtained when correcting the 18F-FDG input function and correcting the tissue activity measurement for 18F physical decay can also be derived from a 2-compartment analysis that does not conceptually involve any physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function but accounts only for the physical decay of the trapped tracer. Results: We demonstrate that exactly the same equation can be derived from the 2 conceptual approaches, and hence each approach yields the correct uptake rate of the tracer. Conclusion: No advantage in 18F-FDG dynamic PET can be expected from using the concept of uncorrected data rather than that of decay-corrected data. Nevertheless, conceptually, we show that correcting the 18F-FDG input function for radioactive decay cannot be justified and that this correction is not compatible with the calculation of patient radiation dose. Copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laffon, E., Barret, O., Marthan, R., & Ducassou, D. (2009). Is the physical decay correction of the 18F-FDG input function in dynamic PET imaging justified? Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 37(2), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.108.060350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free