The group Diffie-Hellman problems

22Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we study generalizations of the Diffie-Hellman problems recently used to construct cryptographic schemes for practical purposes. The Group Computational and the Group Decisional Diffie-Hellman assumptions not only enable one to construct efficient pseudorandom functions but also to naturally extend the Diffie-Hellman protocol to allow more than two parties to agree on a secret key. In this paper we provide results that add to our confidence in the GCDH problem. We reach this aim by showing exact relations among the GCDH, GDDH, CDH and DDH problems. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.

References Powered by Scopus

A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems

12440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New Directions in Cryptography

10614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Public Key Cryptosystem and a Signature Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms

1145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Provably secure authenticated group Diffie-Hellman key exchange

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Constant round authenticated group key agreement via distributed computation

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new method for exchanging secret keys

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bresson, E., Chevassut, O., & Pointcheval, D. (2003). The group Diffie-Hellman problems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2595, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36492-7_21

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

16%

Researcher 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 30

88%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

6%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

3%

Physics and Astronomy 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free