Owners on both sides of the deal: Mergers and acquisitions and overlapping institutional ownership

74Citations
Citations of this article
246Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using a corporate governance lens, this study considers owners with a stake in both the acquiring and the target firms in the context of mergers and acquisitions. A possible agency problem arises with regard to monitoring implications as managers may be able to take advantage of compromised monitoring because overlapping owners may focus on the aggregate value for both the acquiring and the target firms and nonoverlapping owners may be interested only in the acquirer's side of the deal. The results suggest that when more owners overlap in their ownership of both the acquiring and target firms, the acquiring firms are more likely to experience decreased shareholder value through merger and acquisition deals. This effect, however, can be constrained by stronger board control. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goranova, M., Dharwadkar, R., & Brandes, P. (2010). Owners on both sides of the deal: Mergers and acquisitions and overlapping institutional ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 31(10), 1114–1135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.849

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free