Judging density-functional approximations: Some pitfalls of statistics

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Density-functional theory (DFT) methods have achieved widespread popularity for thermochemical predictions, which has lead to extensive benchmarking of functionals. While the use of statistics to judge the quality of various density-functional approximations is valuable and even seems unavoidable, the present chapter suggests some pitfalls of statistical analyses. Several illustrative examples, focusing on analysis of thermochemistry and intermolecular interactions, are presented to show that conclusions can be heavily influenced by both the data-set size and the choice of the criterion used to assess an approximation’s quality. Even with reliable approximations, the risk of publishing inaccurate results naturally increases with the number of calculations reported.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Savin, A., & Johnson, E. R. (2015). Judging density-functional approximations: Some pitfalls of statistics. Topics in Current Chemistry, 365, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/128_2014_600

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free