Fragmented migrant (her)stories: Multi-sited ethnography and feminist migration research

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, I argue that multi-sited ethnography is a powerful tool for doing more rigorous migration research. When guided by a feminist perspective, this methodology destabilizes relations of power between researcher and participants. It also opens opportunities to build links of solidarity across differences such as migrant/citizenship status, race, religion, gender, sexuality, or socio-economic class. The chapter begins with an overview of the concepts of situated knowledge, positionality, and difference as they have been elaborated in feminist and migration scholarship. These are concepts I challenge throughout the chapter. I introduce multi-sited ethnography as a methodology particularly relevant in migration studies, and the discussion draws directly from my own research on the migration of Senegalese women to Spain. I argue that multi-sited ethnography offers insights for research and engagement in at least three areas overlooked by traditional single-sited ethnography: the constitutive connections between different spaces of migration, the possibility of fostering reciprocity and political participation across borders, and the strategic agency of migrants. These strengths make multi-sited research a solid foundation for feminist work in migration studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vives, L. (2012). Fragmented migrant (her)stories: Multi-sited ethnography and feminist migration research. In Feminism and Migration: Cross-Cultural Engagements (pp. 61–77). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2831-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free