'First 1000 days' health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: Alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence

21Citations
Citations of this article
289Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In South Africa (SA), despite adoption of international strategies and approaches, maternal, neonatal and child (MNC) morbidity and mortality rates have not sufficiently declined. Objectives: To conduct an umbrella review (UR) that identifies interventions in low- and middle-income countries, with a high-quality evidence base, that improve MNC morbidity and mortality outcomes within the first 1000 days of life; and to assess the incorporation of the evidence into local strategies, guidelines and documents. Methods: We included publications about women and children in the first 1000 days of life; healthcare professionals and community members. Comparators were those who did not receive the intervention. Interventions were pharmacological and non-pharmacological. Outcomes were MNC morbidity and mortality. Authors conducted English language electronic and manual searches (2000–2013). The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) were reviewed. Interventions were ranked according to level of evidence; and then aligned with SA strategies, policies and guidelines. A tool to extract data was developed and used by two authors who independently extracted data. Summary measures from MAs or summaries of SRs were reviewed and the specificities of the various interventions listed. A search of all local high-level documents was done and these were assessed to determine the specificities of the recommendations and their alignment to the evidence. Results: In total, 19 interventions presented in 32 SRs were identified. Overall, SA's policymakers have sufficiently included high-quality evidence-based interventions into local policies. However, optimal period of birth spacing (two to five years) is not explicitly promoted nor was ante- and postnatal depression adequately incorporated. Antenatal care visits should be increased from four to about eight according to the evidence. Conclusion: Incorporation of existing evidence into policies can be strengthened in SA. The UR methods are useful to inform policymaking and identify research gaps.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

6515Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

3405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The first 1000 days of life: traffic-related air pollution and development of wheezing and asthma in childhood. A systematic review of birth cohort studies

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interventions to reduce preterm birth and stillbirth, and improve outcomes for babies born preterm in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An assessment of health outcomes and methylmercury exposure in munduruku indigenous women of childbearing age and their children under 2 years old

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

English, R., Peer, N., Honikman, S., Tugendhaft, A., & Hofman, K. J. (2017). “First 1000 days” health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: Alignment of South African policies with high-quality evidence. Global Health Action, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1340396

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 97

68%

Researcher 27

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 60

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 46

33%

Social Sciences 18

13%

Psychology 14

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free