Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces

13Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A previous study of genetic counselors (GCs) in the state of Indiana identified movement out of clinical positions within the past 2 years. The aims of this study were to determine if this trend is nationwide and identify reasons why GCs are leaving their positions and factors that might help employers attract and retain GCs. An email was sent to members of the American Board of Genetic Counseling with a link to an online confidential survey. There were 939 responses (23.5% response rate). Overall, 52% of GCs report being highly satisfied in their current position, although almost two thirds think about leaving and one third had changed jobs within the past 2 years. Of those who had changed jobs (n = 295), 74.9% had been working in a hospital/clinic setting but only 46.3% currently do, demonstrating a major shift out of the clinic (p < 0.001). The top three reasons cited for leaving a position were work environment/institutional climate, salary/benefits, and a lack of feeling valued/recognized as a professional. These results confirm that GCs are moving out of clinical positions and document elements of job satisfaction. We suggest points for employers to consider when trying to recruit or retain GCs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, S. A., & Tucker, M. E. (2018). Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27(4), 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0242-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free