Systematic review of interventions targeting fundamental care to reduce hospital-associated decline in older patients

17Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: To examine the effectiveness of targeted nursing interventions on mobilization, nutrition and cognitive engagement to reduce functional and hospital-associated decline (HAD) in older patients. Design: Systematic review of experimental studies using randomized and quasi-experimental designs. Data sources: We searched electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, google scholar and BMJ quality reports from January 2009 to February 2020. Review methods: We reviewed intervention studies that targeted ward nursing teams to increase mobilization, nutrition or cognitive engagement of older adults. Inclusion criteria included older patients, acute care (medical, surgical and older adult wards) and reporting patient level outcomes. Quality appraisal included the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. Results: From 1729 papers, 18 studies using quasi-experimental and pre-post designs were selected. Study heterogeneity necessitated a narrative synthesis. The quality of evidence was low to moderate. All studies used multicomponent strategies, and 10 studies used evidence translation frameworks to align interventions to local barriers. Overall, 74% (n = 14) of studies reported a significant improvement in the stated primary outcome. Eight studies reported a significant increase in mobilization (e.g., sitting in a chair or walking), and four reported improved functional outcomes. Five studies improved nutrition outcomes (e.g., protein or energy intake), and three studies reported a significant reduction in delirium. Conclusion: Acknowledging methodological limitations, the evidence indicates that nursing teams using evidence-translation frameworks can improve mobilization, nutrition and cognitive engagement in acute care settings. Future research requires higher-quality pragmatic trial designs, standardized outcomes, staff co-designed interventions, evidence-translation frameworks and patient engagement to make more confident inference about effectiveness. Impact: Nursing teams with the support of hospital management have to address ward and system barriers to prioritize fundamental care to improve patient outcomes. There is sufficient evidence on multicomponent interventions and implementation strategies to inform nurse-led quality improvement.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

7671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frailty in elderly people

6632Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of a Ward-Based Program on Hospital-Associated Complications and Length of Stay for Older Inpatients: The Cluster Randomized CHERISH Trial

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-Pharmacological Nursing Interventions to Prevent Delirium in ICU Patients—An Umbrella Review with Implications for Evidence-Based Practice

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing a ward-based programme to improve care for older inpatients: process evaluation of the cluster randomised CHERISH trial

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Foubert, M., Cummins, H., McCullagh, R., Brueton, V., & Naughton, C. (2021, December 1). Systematic review of interventions targeting fundamental care to reduce hospital-associated decline in older patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14954

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

68%

Researcher 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 18

45%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

25%

Psychology 10

25%

Social Sciences 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free