Comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), detection and treatment prior to growth beyond 2 cm are important as a larger tumor size is more frequently associated with microvascular invasion and/or satellites. In the surveillance of very small HCC nodules (< 2 cm in maximum diameter, Barcelona clinical stage 0), we demonstrated that the tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein and PIVKA-II are not so useful. Therefore, we must survey with imaging modalities. The superiority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over ultrasound (US) to detect HCC was confirmed in many studies. Although enhanced MRI is now performed to accurately diagnose HCC, in conventional clinical practice for HCC surveillance in liver diseases, unenhanced MRI is widely performed throughout the world. While, MRI has made marked improvements in recent years. AIM To make a comparison of unenhanced MRI and US in detecting very small HCC that was examined in the last ten years in patients in whom MRI and US examinations were performed nearly simultaneously. METHODS In 394 patients with very small HCC nodules, those who underwent MRI and US at nearly the same time (on the same day whenever possible or at least within 14 days of one another) at the first diagnosis of HCC were selected. The detection rate of HCC with unenhanced MRI was investigated and compared with that of unenhanced US. RESULTS The sensitivity of unenhanced MRI for detecting very small HCC was 95.1% (97/102, 95% confidence interval: 90.9-99.3) and that of unenhanced US was 69.6% (71/102, 95% confidence interval: 60.7-78.5). The sensitivity of unenhanced MRI for detecting very small HCC was significantly higher than that of unenhanced US (P < 0.001). Regarding the location of HCC in the liver in patients in whom detection by US was unsuccessful, S7-8 was identified in 51.7%. CONCLUSION Currently, unenhanced MRI is a very useful tool for the surveillance of very small HCC in conventional clinical follow-up practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Hepatocellular carcinoma

3986Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of Ultrasonography, Spiral CT, Magnetic Resonance, and Alpha-Fetoprotein in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review: CME

461Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MRI angiography is superior to helical CT for detection of HCC prior to liver transplantation: An explant correlation

389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

ASAP Score versus GALAD Score for detection of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter case-control analysis

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic literature review of real-world evidence (RWE) on post-market assessment of medical devices

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research progresses of MR rapid sequence in microwave ablation of liver cancer

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tarao, K., Nozaki, A., Chuma, M., Numata, K., Komatsu, H., Komatsu, T., … Maeda, S. (2021). Comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma. World Journal of Hepatology, 13(6), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i6.699

Readers over time

‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Immunology and Microbiology 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0