Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows a boolean probit analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine, the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (B.I.F.), reports that fellowships are awarded to post-graduate researchers according to the following main criteria: (1) scientific quality as demonstrated by the applicant's achievements to date, (2) the originality of the proposed research project, and (3) the scientific standing of the laboratory where the research will be conducted. Using the Boolean probit statistical technique, this study examines the multiple conjunctural causation that a fellowship will be awarded only if all three of these criteria are assessed positively by the B.I.F. peer review committee. In agreement with the prescriptive principles of the foundation the results suggest that the B.I.F. approves applications only if all of the three criteria are rated positively. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research

361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peer review of grant applications: What do we know?

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scientific peer review

372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2005). Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows a boolean probit analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00326.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

36%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Psychology 2

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free