Degradation of ionic liquids by a UV/H2O2 process and CMCase from novel ionic liquid-tolerant alkaliphilic Nocardiopsis sp. SSC4

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We demonstrated the degradation of two ionic liquids (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, [BMIM]Cl, and 1-ethylpyridinium bromide, [EtPy]Br) that are useful for the solubilization of wood components. [BMIM]+ and [EtPy]+ were detected by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). [BMIM]+ was harder to degrade than [EtPy]+. Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation with 0.2% (v/v) H2O2 for 16 h degraded 1 mmol/L [BMIM]+, whereas UV irradiation alone degraded 1 mmol/L [EtPy]+. Additionally, we isolated an ionic liquid-tolerant alkaliphilic actinomycete, Nocardiopsis sp. SSC4. Strain SSC4 produced carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) in the presence of 1.0% (v/v, 48.1 mmol/L) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulphonate ([EMIM]CF3SO3), which is useful for the extraction of cellulose-rich materials from wood. In the case of strain SSC4, CMCase was inducibly synthesized by more than 0.5% CMC. The addition of 0%–1.0% tryptone or 0%–2.0% yeast extract decreased the CMCase activity in a concentration-dependent manner. After cultivation of strain SSC4 with 1.0% (w/v) CMC medium (pH 9.0) for 48 h at 37 °C, the culture supernatant exhibited CMCase activity at 0.03 U/mg. The optimum reaction temperature of CMCase was 45 °C. CMCase was stable up to 37 °C for 20 h incubation. The degradation characteristics of [BMIM]+ and [EtPy]+ and the activity of CMCase in the presence of [EMIM]CF3SO3 may be useful for the development of a bioconversion system for biomass resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurata, A., Shimizu, S., Shiraishi, Y., Abe, M., Naito, N., Shimada, M., & Kishimoto, N. (2017). Degradation of ionic liquids by a UV/H2O2 process and CMCase from novel ionic liquid-tolerant alkaliphilic Nocardiopsis sp. SSC4. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 31(4), 749–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1335613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free