Semi-destructive method to derive allometric aboveground biomass model for village forest of Bangladesh: Comparison of regional and pan-tropical models

8Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pan-tropical biomass models were developed for natural and plantation forests, which cover a wide range of geographical areas and tree species. Tree architecture of a species significantly varies among plantations and natural forests as well as village forests or homestead areas. Tree architecture has a significant influence on biomass estimation in allometric models. Therefore, it was hypothesised that pan-tropical biomass models may not be able to address the desired accuracy in biomass estimation for village forests. The objective of this study was to derive a common allometric above-ground biomass model for a village forest in Bangladesh and to compare the efficiency of the derived model with frequently used pan-tropical models. This study adopted a semi-destructive method, where the biomass of individual sampled trees was derived from stem volume, wood density and biomass expansion factor. Eight linear models [natural logarithm(Ln) transformed] were used to derive the best-fit allometric biomass model. In comparison with the best-fit model, the frequently used pan-tropical models showed significant estimation of total above-ground biomass (TAGB). Therefore, the derived model for the village forest showed higher capacity to reduce uncertainty in biomass estimation compared to pan-tropical models. This finding may restrict the indiscriminate use of pan-tropical models without checking their accuracy towards a particular forest type and species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahmood, H., Siddique, M. R. H., Abdullah, S. M. R., Islam, S. M. Z., Matieu, H., Iqbal, M. Z., & Akhter, M. (2020). Semi-destructive method to derive allometric aboveground biomass model for village forest of Bangladesh: Comparison of regional and pan-tropical models. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 32(3), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.26525/JTFS2020.32.3.246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free