Skip to main content
Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

The Climate Finance Conundrum

Development (Basingstoke) (2022) 65(1) 29-41
DOI: 10.1057/s41301-022-00329-0
13Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

International climate finance is key to managing overall climate risk with many developing countries’ climate plans and actions are conditional on getting the necessary financial support. Unsurprisingly, helping fund poorer countries to address climate change is one of the most contentious subjects in climate politics. This article examines the state of play and offers some suggestions to unblock the impasse.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?

Climate and Development
95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance

Nature Climate Change
90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of heavily indebted poor countries initiative (HIPC) on millennium development goals (MDGs) for education

Review of Social Economy
2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Have consumption-based CO<inf>2</inf> emissions in developed countries peaked?

Energy Policy
12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Business, Government and the SDGs: The Role of Public-Private Engagement in Building a Sustainable Future

Business, Government and the SDGs: The Role of Public-Private Engagement in Building a Sustainable Future
6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender Equality, Climate Action, and Technological Innovation for Sustainable Development in Africa

Sustainable Development Goals Series
5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chowdhury, A., & Jomo, K. S. (2022). The Climate Finance Conundrum. Development (Basingstoke), 65(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-022-00329-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

24%

Researcher 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 9

39%

Business, Management and Accounting 8

35%

Social Sciences 4

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free