Combined neuromodulatory interventions in acute experimental pain: Assessment of melatonin and non-invasive brain stimulation

20Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and melatonin can effectively treat pain. Given their potentially complementary mechanisms of action, their combination could have a synergistic effect. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that compared to the control condition and melatonin alone, tDCS combined with melatonin would have a greater effect on pain modulatory effect, as assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST) and by the pain level during the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)-task. Furthermore, the combined treatment would have a greater cortical excitability effect as indicated by the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and on the serum BDNF level. Healthy males (n = 20), (aged 18-40 years), in a blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover, clinical trial, were randomized into three groups: sublingual melatonin (0.25 mg/kg) + a-tDCS, melatonin (0.25 mg/kg) + sham-(s)-tDCS, or sublingual placebo+sham-(s)-tDCS. Anodal stimulation (2 mA, 20 min) was applied over the primary motor cortex. There was a significant difference in the heat pain threshold (°C) for melatonin+a-tDCS vs. placebo+s-tDCS (mean difference: 4.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9 to 8.63) and melatonin+s-tDCS vs. placebo+s-tDCS (mean: 5.16, 95% CI: 0.84 to 8.36). There was no difference between melatonin+s-tDCS and melatonin+a-tDCS (mean difference: 0.29, 95% CI: −3.72 to 4.23). The mean change from the baseline on amplitude of motor evocate potential (MEP) was significantly higher in the melatonin+a-tDCS (−19.96% ± 5.2) compared with melatonin+s-tDCS group (−1.36% ± 5.35) and with placebo+s-tDCS group (3.61% ± 10.48), respectively (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). While melatonin alone or combined with a-tDCS did not significantly affect CPM task result, and serum BDNF level. The melatonin effectively reduced pain; however, its association with a-tDCS did not present an additional modulatory effect on acute induced pain.

References Powered by Scopus

Comparison of Beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients

4744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation

4476Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research

4247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates attention and pain in fibromyalgia: Randomized clinical trial

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Silva, N. R. J., Laste, G., Deitos, A., Stefani, L. C., Cambraia-Canto, G., Torres, I. L. S., … Caumo, W. (2015). Combined neuromodulatory interventions in acute experimental pain: Assessment of melatonin and non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00077

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

59%

Researcher 18

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 34

49%

Neuroscience 20

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

13%

Psychology 7

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free