Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-capecitabine combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Recent randomized controlled trials revealed the combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) regime shows promising efficacy in pancreatic cancer patients. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) with GemCap for pancreatic cancer. Methods: The database of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Controster of Controlled Trials, Web of Science was searched for relevant randomized controlled trials before 8 April, 2020. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), 12-month survival rate, progress free survival (PFS), partial response rate (PRR), objective response rate (ORR), and Grade 3/4 toxicities. Results: Five randomized controlled trials involving 1879 patients were included in this study. The results showed that GemCap significantly improves the OS (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.037-1.276, P = .008), PFS (hazard ratio = 1.211, 95% CI 1.09-1.344, P = 0), PRR (relative risk (RR) = 0.649, 95% CI 0.488-0.862, P = .003), ORR (RR = 0.605, 95% CI 0.458-0.799, P = 0), and the overall toxicity (RR = 0.708, 95% CI 0.620-0.808, P = .000) compared to Gem alone. However, no significant difference was found in 12-month survival. Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 toxicity, GemCap was associated with better outcomes of OS, PFS, PRR, ORR, as compared with Gem, which is likely to become a promising therapy for pancreatic cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ouyang, G., Wu, Y., Liu, Z., Lu, W., Li, S., Hao, S., & Pan, G. (2021, December 3). Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-capecitabine combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free