Selectively Enhanced Development of Working Memory in Musically Trained Children and Adolescents

19Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the current longitudinal study, we investigated the development of working memory in musically trained and nontrained children and adolescents, aged 9–20. We measured working memory with the Digit Span (DS) forwards and backwards tests (N = 106) and the Trail-Making A and B (TMT-A and B; N = 104) tests three times, in 2011, 2013, and 2016. We expected that musically trained participants would outperform peers with no musical training. Indeed, we found that the younger musically trained participants, in particular, outperformed their nontrained peers in the TMT-A, TMT-B and DS forwards tests. These tests all primarily require active maintenance of a rule in memory or immediate recall. In contrast, we found no group differences in the backwards test that requires manipulation and updating of information in working memory. These results suggest that musical training is more strongly associated with heightened working memory capacity and maintenance than enhanced working memory updating, especially in late childhood and early adolescence.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
9551Citations
15032Readers
Get full text

Executive functions

8975Citations
8656Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

The power of musican exploration of the evidence

22Citations
273Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saarikivi, K. A., Huotilainen, M., Tervaniemi, M., & Putkinen, V. (2019). Selectively Enhanced Development of Working Memory in Musically Trained Children and Adolescents. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00062

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

63%

Researcher 7

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

44%

Neuroscience 9

28%

Social Sciences 5

16%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0